Final Paper

ITP Core 1 requires a final paper. The form of this culminating work is up to you, but the paper should fulfill a few goals:

  1. This paper should take one of the topics, authors, or lenses we have studied this semester and demonstrate your understanding of how it applies to digital technology and pedagogy in your own discipline. Even though most of you do not yet know the project you will pursue for your ITP independent study, think of this work as laying the foundation for it. Maybe you want to think about how the data supply chain interacts with the literary canon, or how Freire applies to science education. Maybe you are interested in game-based learning in sociology, or pedagogical breakthroughs like Shaughnessy’s in theater, or understanding how BIPOC and women have created digital frameworks in psychology. These are just examples! You should make sure that what you take up in this paper is important to you and the work you want to do in ITP and your classrooms and teaching in the future.
  1. The paper should be 5000-7500 words (~15-20 pages ). You’re welcome to use whatever citation style is appropriate to your field.

  2. The paper should be presented in a medium that makes sense for the ideas you are laying out.

  3. The paper is due on December 20 by the start of class to both Jill and Maura. We’ll share a Dropbox link for submission as it gets closer.

*As always, Jill and Maura are here to consult and support you! We encourage you to reach out if you would like to talk about your topic or paper-in-progress, and especially to make sure the scope and form are feasible for a paper submitted by December 20.

Lesson Plan Assignment

Lesson Plan Assignment

Due:
10/25 lesson plan in class peer review
11/1 revise/submit Word doc via Dropbox
11/8 Jill/Maura return to you with feedback
11/22 revised lesson plan to Dropbox + in-class presentation
(Dropbox links are in the course group forum)

11/22 Brief Class Presentation Guidelines:
In 5 minutes or less, please share with us your answers to these questions:
– What is the lesson? What do you hope to accomplish?
– Who is this lesson for? (course, student level)
– Why did you select this technology to use in this lesson, how does it facilitate your learning objectives?
Then briefly talk us through a high-level overview of the lesson itself.

In Brief: We want you to create a 75-minute lesson plan appropriate for your field.  Assume an audience of undergraduate students (unless you are working with another demographic and want to tailor your lesson plan to them). Your lesson should integrate one or more important concepts in your field with one or more relevant technologies.

Assignment Requirements

Reflection + Rationale

In 1-2 paragraphs, offer a critical reflection on your lesson plan & the process behind it.

You’ll state your goals & assessment below, but here take a moment to zoom out and reflect on your core pedagogical values (think back to our discussions in class on 8/30) and your rationale for this lesson plan in relation to them. How does this assignment embody those values? How can you design / teach / scaffold these values even within other constraints that might exist (curriculum requirements, time limitations, rules / regulations from your employer, etc.)?

In addition, consider the value of explicitly making this type of lesson plan (do you usually make lesson plans? if so, is this how you usually approach?); what you’ve learned from this assignment / process;  what went well; what you’re struggling with; what questions you have for your peers / professors about next steps.

Goals

Write (bullet out) 3-6 goals that you have for this lesson. What will students learn?

Assessment

Next to each goal, write out how you will know how successfully students have achieved each goal. One assessment can cover more than one goal.

Activities

Please write out each of the activities you wish students to engage in, and explain how they meet the goals you have set for the lesson.

Timelime

Please break down your lesson into minutes and write out how much time you will be spending for each activity.

Materials

What special materials, if any, will your students need for this lesson?

 

Sample Lesson

Teaching Students to Use Hypothes.is for Critical Reading


Rationale / Reflection

[TBD in class together!]


Goals

  • To teach students the basics of how to use the online annotation tool hypothes.is

  • To reinforce critical reading skills

  • To explicitly explain to students how hypothes.is will help with critical reading


Assessment

  • I will ask students to perform the following basic tasks: add an annotation, add a tag, add an annotation on an existing annotation. I can easily see on the shared text if students are able to do these tasks, and can work individually with students who need help.

  • We will read and annotate section I of Epictetus’s Enchiridion, not just for practice, but in terms of its content. Based on their annotations, I will be able to assess their critical reading skills in a preliminary way, which will help me shape future discussions around critical reading. As we review students’ annotations as a class, I will explicitly reinforce the idea of how academics hold “conversations” with one another over time and throughout history.

Activities and Timeline

5 Minutes: Attendance, class business, questions from students.

5 minutes: Freewrite: What does the phrase critical reading mean to you?

10 Minutes: PowerPoint presentation on the importance of critical reading, academic inquiry as a conversation that spans history. (Six slides)

15 Minutes: Introduction to Hypothes.is. What the tool does, how shared annotations can help us learn both faster and better, how it’s important to “talk back” to a text as you’re reading, how we can help each other contextualize the text

15 Minutes: We download the tool or set up the bookmarklet app, sign all students up to the ENG 100.5 group I’ve created, and start experimenting with annotation. Students will receive an assignment to add an annotation, add a tag, and add an annotation to someone else’s annotation. Their annotations and tags should be in the service of helping themselves and the class better understand The Enchiridion. That means: 1. asking a question; 2. Expressing an opinion about something Epictetus has written; 3. Providing historical context (by looking something up and providing a link); 4. Defining a word.

15 Minutes: Discussion of students’ annotations, with live notes about how we can be even more helpful to one another. Live editing during the discussion!

5 Minutes: Wrap-up. Homework assignment: Read and annotate sections II-X of The Enchiridion. You must ask at least three questions, make three comments, provide one link of context (history, biography, etc.), and define one word. It’s more than okay to layer answers on top of other people’s answers!

5 Minutes: cushion in case any of the above activities run over.


Materials

Students will not need any materials in addition to ones we’ve already been using for the class (e.g. computer, internet connection, etc.).

Digital Humanities Artifact

Find something that you think of as a digital humanities artifact. This might be something from your field, something pertaining to teaching, a piece of public scholarship, etc. How can digital projects combine critical reflection and pedagogy to do new or interesting things?

Here’s an example. http://dsl.richmond.edu/emancipation/

Be ready to talk about this in class on September 13.

Take the Student Survey

Welcome to ITP Core 1! We want to help you have the best semester possible. If you can answer these questions, it will help us do that. Please complete this survey by our first class meeting on August 30.

  • List the name you would like to be called. It does not need to be the name on the roster.
  • The best email for us to reach you. It does not need to be a CUNY email.